Velasco v. State
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtRaymond R. Abramson, Judge
hOn October 14, 2015, a Pulaski County jury convicted Miguel Velasco of maintaining a drug premises within 1000 feet of a certified drug-free zone. On appeal, Velas-co argues that the trial court erred in denying his motions for directed verdict and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict because there was insufficient evidence to convict him of maintaining a drug premises. 1 For the following reasons, we affirm.
Testimony presented at trial indicates that at 5:30 á.m. on November 12, 2014, Pulaski County Sheriffs Office Investigator Kenneth Hollis and members of the sheriffs | i>office…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Walley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- Hodge v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
- Loggins v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010
- Hinton v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015
- Franklin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Worsham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2017
- Miller v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018
- Richard Varnell v. State of ArkansasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2025