Legal Opinion
Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 28, 1993No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Defendants Alekna and Holland, as intervenors, appeal from two orders of Supreme Court. The first granted the motion of plaintiff Bethlehem Steel Corporation (Bethlehem) for summary judgment against defendant United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company (USF&G), a nonappealing party, on Bethlehem’s claim to recover on a labor and material payment bond issued by USF&G. Intervenors additionally *1059appeal from a subsequent order that, although granting them leave to intervene, denied their motion to renew the prior summary judgment motion.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Timberline Electric Supply Corp. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Timberline Electric Supply Corp. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Davis Wallbridge, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
3Cited by4 opinions
- Graham Architectural Products Corp. v. St. Paul Mercury InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2004
- Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- East Aurora Coop. Mkt., Inc. v. Red Brick Plaza LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- Iron Workers District Council v. D. R. Chamberlain Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1997