Legal Opinion
Graham Architectural Products Corp. v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided January 27, 2004No. 1:00-cv-06204PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
BLOCK, District Judge.
Invoking diversity jurisdiction, plaintiff Graham Architectural Products Corp. (“Graham”) seeks payment from defendant and third-party plaintiff St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company (“St.Paul”) under a material and labor payment bond issued by St. Paul to third party defendant River-view Architectural Products, Inc. (“River-view”). Graham and St. Paul both move for summary judgment. Principally at issue is whether a subcontractor may recover against a defaulting contractor’s surety for material or labor costs incurred by the subcontractor in the…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Clifford F. MacEvoy Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Calvin Tomkins Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Schaghticoke Powder Co. v. Greenwich & Johnsonville Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1905
- Active Fire Sprinkler Corp. v. The United States Postal Service and John T. Brady and Company, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Morin v. Empiyah & Co., LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Graham Architectural Products v. St. Paul Mercury InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004