Legal Opinion

Seeno v. Discovery Builders, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided February 20, 2024No. 5:23-cv-04072Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 ALBERT D. SEENO, et al., Case No. 5:23-cv-04072-EJD 9 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS 10 v. 11 DISCOVERY BUILDERS, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 21 Defendants. 12 13 Plaintiffs Albert D. Seeno, Jr. (“Seeno”) and Albert D. Seeno Construction Co. (“Seeno 14 Construction”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) bring claims for trademark infringement and false 15 designation of origin under the Lanham Act,

15 U.S.C. §§ 1051, et seq., against Defendants 16 Discovery Builders, Inc., (“Discovery…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Brookfield Communications, Inc. v. West Coast Entertainment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  4. Retail Property Trust v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  5. Campbell, Tom v. Clinton, William J.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API