Legal Opinion

Siegman v. Keeler

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided December 4, 1893PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Motion for reargument. Denied.

1Per curiam

A motion for reargument is allowed only where it appears-that some question decisive of the case, and which was presented by counsel upon the argument, has been overlooked by the court, or that the decision is inconsistent with some statute, of with a controlling decision, to which the-*1149attention of the court was not drawn, through the neglect or inadvertence of counsel. Rule 16, Gen. Term, Com. Pl. N. Y. The opinion handed down at the time of the decision of the appeal herein (4 Misc. Rep. 528, 24 N. Y. Supp. 821) refutes the claim ' that either of the grounds above specified exists, and the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Siegman v. KeelerNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1893

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Central Park Baptist Church v. PattersonNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1895
  2. Central Park Baptist Church v. PattersonNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API