Central Park Baptist Church v. Patterson

The motion for reargument is based upon a contention involving examination into the state of the evi*637dence merely, and appellants’ counsel acknowledges that the point was not presented to the court on argument of the appeal. Upon this ground the motion might well be denied. (Siegman v. Keller, 6 Misc. Rep. 593; Geoghegan v. Atlas S. S. Co., Id. 127), but upon the merits of the contention it is found to be without weight. The claim is that no evidence was given to support the allegation that the petitioner, Frazer, was appointed custodian of the church edifice by the board of trustees of the…