Legal Opinion
Urantia Foundation v. Maaherra
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided February 27, 1995No. Civ. 91-0325 PHX WKUPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON TRADEMARK ISSUES
URBOM, Senior District Judge.
This cause is before me on the plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The plaintiff, Urantia Foundation, alleges that the defendant, Kristen Maaherra, has infringed two of its registered trademarks. The defendant denies the allegation of infringement and contends that the plaintiffs marks are generic and were obtained fraudulently. Upon review of the record, I find that the plaintiffs motion shall be…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Park 'N Fly, Inc. v. Dollar Park & Fly, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Amf Incorporated, a Corporation v. Sleekcraft Boats, a Sole Proprietorship, and Bruce E. Nescher, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Urantia Foundation, a Non-Profit Foundation v. Kristen MaaherraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- National Federation of Blind, Inc. v. Loompanics Enterprises, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1996
- Commonwealth v. MelsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989