Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Nixon v. Taylor

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 2, 2000No. WD 56788PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES M. SMART, Jr., Judge.

This case involves the issue of whether the application of the Missouri Incarceration Reimbursement Act (“MIRA”) to a Missouri prisoner incarcerated prior to the effective date of the act violates provisions related to ex post facto laws. Jon Marc Taylor appeals the trial court’s judgment ordering that ninety percent of his assets be paid to the State of Missouri pursuant to MIRA.

MIRA authorizes the state to recover reimbursement of the cost of maintaining Taylor in a state prison facility, up to ninety percent of the value of the assets of the inmate. Section…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Flemming v. NestorSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Ex Parte GarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  3. De Veau v. BraistedSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Samuel H. Peeler v. Margaret Heckler, Secretary, Department of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
  5. Burns v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Davis v. KempkerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. State v. ChristianMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. State v. Strickland, No. Cv 00 0803071 S (Nov. 18, 2002)Connecticut Superior Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API