Legal Opinion

Carlberg v. Willmott

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 5, 1930No. 12,292PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Alter

John Oar lb erg, plaintiff in error, will hereinafter be referred to as defendant, and Joe Willmott, defendant in error, as plaintiff.

The plaintiff began his action in a justice of the peace court to recover damages in the sum of $250, for which amount, upon verdict of the jury, judgment was entered in his favor. The defendant appealed to the county court, where, upon verdict of the jury, a judgment was entered in plaintiff’s favor for the sum of $150, to review which this writ of error is prosecuted. The three assignments of error requiring our attention may be classified as follows: (1)…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Glass & Bryant Mercantile Co. v. Farmers State BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
  2. MELSHEIMER v. SULLIVAN.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Melsheimer v. SullivanColorado Court of Appeals · 1891
  4. Schaffer v. LovelandSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Illinois Building Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1932
  2. Barger v. JimersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1954
  3. Rutherford v. ScarboroughColorado Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. Illinois Building Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API