Legal Opinion
LaRocca v. Borden, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided January 8, 2002No. 00-2386, 00-2387PublishedCited by 86 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LIPEZ, Circuit Judge.
This case concerns the remedies due for violations of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1461. The parties have stipulated that Borden, Inc. improperly terminated the plaintiffs from Borden’s Total Family Protection Plan (hereafter “the Plan”) of life, health, dental, and disability insurance. They only dispute the remedy due under the law. Borden contends that the plaintiffs are only due reinstatement in the Plan, and reimbursement for expenses incurred that would have been covered by the Plan. For the most part, the district…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by86 opinions
- Innova Hosp. San Antonio, Ltd. v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Ga., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
- United States Ex Rel. Gagne v. City of WorcesterCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- Brody v. Stone & Webster, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- Feliciano-Hernandez v. Pereira-CastilloCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- Goodwin Ex Rel. Estate of Lunnin v. C.N.J., Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.