Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Brooks v. Freeland

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided November 23, 1931PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.

This is an original proceeding in prohibition. The object sought is to permanently prohibit the respondent, Hon. W. L. Freeland, one of the Circuit Judges of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit of this State, from requiring the relator, Marion Brooks, an attorney at law, to return into the registry of the court the sum of $1572.08 alleged to have been withdrawn by him for his client under order of Hon. H. F. Atkinson, another judge of the same Circuit, in a cause wherein W. & W. Corporation was complainant, and Max Feit, et al., were defendants, under penalty of being committed to jail for contempt…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Reynolds v. WhiteSupreme Court of Florida · 1898
  2. State ex rel. Floral City Phosphate Co. v. HockerSupreme Court of Florida · 1894
  3. State Ex Rel. Anderson v. ParksSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  4. State ex rel. Gary v. DavisSupreme Court of Florida · 1922
  5. W. & W. Corp. v. FeitSupreme Court of Florida · 1931

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Deemer v. Hallett Pontiac, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  2. State Ex Rel. Marshall v. PettewaySupreme Court of Florida · 1935
  3. State Ex Rel. McGregor v. PeacockSupreme Court of Florida · 1934
  4. State Ex Rel. American Fire & Casualty Co. v. BarnsSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
  5. City of Coral Gables v. BlountSupreme Court of Florida · 1938

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API