Legal Opinion

Cuno of the Family Hansen v. Wetz

District Court, D. South Dakota

Decided June 25, 2025No. 5:25-cv-05011Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA WESTERN DIVISION CUNO OF THE FAMILY HANSEN, 5:25-CV-05011-ECS Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER DENYING vs. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO SET ASIDE CLERK’S DENIAL OF DEFAULT AND MAX WETZ, THROUGH THE IV-D GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO AGENCY; DISMISS Defendant. This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff Cuno of the Family Hansen’s (“Hansen”) Motion to Set Aside Clerk’s Denial of Default, Doc. 7, and Defendant Max Wetz’s Motion to Dismiss, Doc. 9. I. Background Hansen’s Complaint brings claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Doc. 1. Hansen alleges that…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API