Legal Opinion

Holmes v. . Holmes

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 5, 1881PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRufeiN, J.

The petitioners, who are the defendants in the above entitled action, make application for a writ of certiorari and assign'the following reasons: That ata trial of the action had at June term, 1880, of the superior court-of New Hanover, there -was a verdict and judgment in favor ■of the plaintiffs, from which the petitioners appealed, giving ■due notice of their appeal and executing a bond. That no ¡statement, of the case on appeal was prepared and served (within the time; but their attorney hadan understanding ■w-ith the plaintiffs’ attorneys that it would be satisfactory'to ¡all parties if…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Walton v. . PearsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. . PriceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
  2. Office v. . BlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
  3. State v. . PriceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API