Legal Opinion

Office v. . Bland

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 5, 1884PublishedCited by 5 opinions

PetitioN of defendant for writ of certiorari, heard at October Term, 1884, of The Supreme Court. See same case, reported in 87 N. C., 168, and 90 N. C., 6.

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, C. J.

The appeal in this case was dismissed at the last term of this court for the reason that it was not prose cuted and the transcript filed for docketing at the term next succeeding that of the superior court at which the appeal was entered.

The case is again, brought before us on an application for a writ of certiorari to bring up the record in order that it may be heard, based upon an alleged waiver of a strict observance of the rule prescribed in the Code of Civil Procedure for making the appeal effectual in the appellate court.

Accompanying the sworn petition are affidavits of the petitioner’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Walton v. . PearsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
  2. Adams v. ReevesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876
  3. Rouse v. . QuinnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876
  4. Scroggs v. . AlexanderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
  5. Holmes v. . HolmesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. . PriceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
  2. Joyner v. EarlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. A. F. Messick Grocery Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  4. Adams v. . ReevesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876
  5. State v. . PriceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API