Legal Opinion
William C. Everard v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided October 15, 1996No. 95-2090PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, Circuit Judge.
Defendant William C. Everard appeals from the district court’s order in this federal habeas case concluding that Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32(a)(2) 1 did not require the sentencing court to advise the defendant of his right to appeal in the circumstances of this case and that defendant knowingly and voluntarily entered- his plea agreement. Finding no reversible error in these conclusions, we affirm the decision of the district court.
I
Everard entered into a Rule 11 plea agreement with the government on March 24, 1993, in which he pleaded guilty to one count of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. Lawrence BuchananCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Nidal Bazzi (95-1435), Robert Michael Kelly (95-1505)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Albert Allen Paige v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1971
- United States v. James Anderson DeansCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
- United States v. Curtis DrummondCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Carrasquillo, J.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- United States v. Donelle FlemingCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Brian K. Hunter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Michael D. StubbsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Ronald FisherCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.