Legal Opinion
Sadwith v. Lantry
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 11, 1963PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EDELSTEIN, District Judge.
The plaintiff was a party to an agree: ment dated May 21, 1926, whereby he sold his one-half interest in the defendant Universal Sheet Metal Works, Inc. to the defendant, Jacob Lantry, the owner of the remaining one-half interest. Sadwith now seeks to have Lantry and the other defendants “account in equity” for certain transactions concerning real property which was, in part, the subject matter of the agreement. Sad-with’s contentions, to be more fully explored infra, are that the legal effect of the May 21, 1926, agreement was to create an express trust over the…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co. v. BurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Beaver v. . BeaverNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Klein v. BowerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- Colonial Refrigerated Transportation, Inc. v. George P. Mitchell, George P. Mitchell v. Colonial Refrigerated Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Beckman v. Walter Kidde & CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1970
- Goodwin v. City of BloomfieldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
- Dogan v. Harbert Construction Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.