Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Mullen v. Howell

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1919No. 15313PublishedCited by 50 opinions

Application filed in the supreme court April 9, 1919, for a writ of mandamus to compel the secretary of state to accept and file a petition for a referendum.

1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, C. J.

At the general election held in 1912, the people of the state of Washington adopted as a principle of government the power to initiate laws and to review at the bar of popular opinion all acts, bills, or laws passed by the legislature of the state of Washington.

The right so to do is emphasized as a power reserved, and the terms of the amendment imply in the strongest possible way that the intention of the people was to reserve a right to review every act of the legislature which might affect the people in their civil rights or limit or extend their political liberties; for they wrote an…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Noble State Bank v. HaskellSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Maxwell v. DowSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  4. Pacific States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  5. Ohio Ex Rel. Davis v. HildebrantSupreme Court of the United States · 1916

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. State v. ManussierWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. ManussierWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  3. American Federation of Labor-Congress of Industrial Organizations v. EuCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State Ex Rel. Humiston v. MeyersWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Brower v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1998

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API