Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Dulin

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 10, 1983No. Docket 58599Published

1DissentP. J. Marutiak, J.

I respectfully dissent and would not allow this defendant to withdraw his plea.

Defendant’s main reliance is upon People v Dixon, 103 Mich App 518; 303 NW2d 32 (1981). To the extent that Dixon seems to infer that specific performance of a sentence bargain is a proper remedy, I disagree. Dixon reiterates that a breach of a sentence agreement only entitles defendant to withdraw his guilty plea, People v Hagewood, 88 Mich App 35; 276 NW2d 585 (1979), and that specific performance is not available as an alternative remedy because the authority to pronounce sentences is within the exclusive…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Del RioMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
  2. People v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  3. People v. HagewoodMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. People v. DixonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. People v. PalmaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API