Legal Opinion

United States v. Hubbard

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided June 18, 1979No. 36,170; ACM S24578Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COOK, Judge:

Contrary to his pleas, the appellant was convicted by special court-martial, with members, of larceny, in violation of Article 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 921. We granted review to consider the following issues:

I. THE MILITARY JUDGE ERRED IN ADMITTING PROSECUTION EXHIBIT 3 OVER DEFENSE OBJECTION THAT IT WAS THE PRODUCT OF AN ILLEGAL SEARCH.

II. THE BASE COMMANDER WAS PER SE DISQUALIFIED FROM AUTHORIZING THE SEARCH BECAUSE OF THE NATURE OF HIS OFFICE.

III. AN ORAL REQUEST FOR AUTHORIZATION TO SEARCH AND ORAL PERMISSION TO SEARCH ARE LEGALLY DEFICIENT.

IV.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. United States v. TempiaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
  3. United States v. EzellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
  4. People v. . Van GaasbeckNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  5. United States v. Joseph Giacalone and One 1975 Mercury Four-Door Automobile, Maroon in Color, Bearing License Plate Number Tms 416Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API