Taylor v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING RELIANCE’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
JAMES L. ROBART, District Judge.
This matter comes before the court on Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company’s (“Reliance”) motion for summary judgment (Dkt. # 35). Having considered the briefing of the parties, the administrative record, and the relevant law, and having heard oral argument, the court DENIES Reliance’s motion for summary judgment (Dkt. # 35).
I. BACKGROUND
This is an ERISA case in which Plaintiff Alex Taylor challenges Reliance’s termination of his long term disability (“LTD”) benefits. Mr. Taylor worked at Defendant Corbis…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- United States v. HinksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Abatie v. Alta Health & Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Maher v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2016
- Walker v. Commissioner Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2021