Roe v. Quality Transportation Services
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.
Jane Roe, 1 a private employee, was terminated from her office position with Brader Hauling Service, Inc., a subsidiary of Quality Transportation Services, for refusing to submit to drug testing pursuant to a company policy. Ms. Roe brought a wrongful discharge action against Brader and Quality (collectively referred to as Quality). The trial court granted Quality's motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted (CR 12(b)(6)) holding there was no clear mandate of public policy prohibiting a private employer from requiring drug testing of a terminable-at-will…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Thompson v. St. Regis Paper CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Harless v. First National Bank in FairmontWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. StroudWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Dicomes v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1989
- Parnar v. Americana Hotels, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1982
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Stein v. Davidson Hotel Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1997
- Roberts v. DudleyWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Hart v. Seven Resorts Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
- Sedlacek v. HillisWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- Lords v. Northern Automotive Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1994
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.