Legal Opinion

State v. Santiago

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided June 24, 1993PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

De LUCCIA, J.S.C.

This case raises the question whether a defendant in a criminal trial has been denied rights guaranteed under the Sixth Amendment of the federal Constitution as well as article I, paragraph 10 of the New Jersey Constitution when, due to inadvertence, confidential and privileged communications between defendant and defense counsel are recorded on the court’s sound recording system.

This issue developed in the following fashion. On April 28, 1993, the court scheduled a hearing on defendant’s motion filed pursuant to R. 3:5-7 seeking to suppress certain evidence seized by the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Weatherford v. BurseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. State v. SugarSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  4. State v. SugarSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  5. United States v. NoriegaDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. SwintNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
  2. State v. AtesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009
  3. State of New Jersey v. Christopher MazzarisiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API