Legal Opinion

Natale v. Mazzuki

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 29, 1951PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

In an action for an injunction to remove an encroachment, order denying plaintiffs’ motion to strike out the separate defenses in the answer of defendant Joseph Mazzuki, as insufficient in law, modified on the law by striking from the ordering paragraph the words “in all respects, hereby denied,” and substituting therefor “in so far as the first and second separate defenses are concerned, denied, and granted as to the third separate defense.” As so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs. The complaint alleges that the buildings of the parties adjoin. On the argument of the appeal,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Abrams v. Maryland Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1949
  2. Carroll v. . BullockNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  3. Holland v. . GroteNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  4. Ansbacher v. New York Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1939
  5. Straus v. American Publishers' Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Board of Education of Central School District No. 2 v. NyquistNew York Supreme Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API