Connecticut Bank & Trust Co. v. Dadi
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Per curiam
The issue on this appeal is whether the trial court erred in ordering a judgment awarding the plaintiff damages and reasonable attorney’s fees based upon certain defaults by the defendant as to four promissory notes and a Master Charge account, and overdrafts of a checking account.
In his answer to the plaintiff’s complaint, the defendant 1 filed a general denial and raised several special defenses and a counterclaim, but did not challenge the execution of any of the instruments.
As to counts one, three, four and five, all of which involved promissory notes, § 42a-3-307 (2) of the General…
2Cited by18 opinions
- Thompson & Peck, Inc. v. Harbor Marine Contracting Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. CannonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Goldberger v. REGENCY HIGHLAND CONDOMINIUMDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- Amatulli v. People's BankDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1996
- Pingel v. Connecticut National BankDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.