Legal Opinion

Connecticut Bank & Trust Co. v. Dadi

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 16, 1980PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

The issue on this appeal is whether the trial court erred in ordering a judgment awarding the plaintiff damages and reasonable attorney’s fees based upon certain defaults by the defendant as to four promissory notes and a Master Charge account, and overdrafts of a checking account.

In his answer to the plaintiff’s complaint, the defendant 1 filed a general denial and raised several special defenses and a counterclaim, but did not challenge the execution of any of the instruments.

As to counts one, three, four and five, all of which involved promissory notes, § 42a-3-307 (2) of the General…

2Cited by18 opinions

  1. Thompson & Peck, Inc. v. Harbor Marine Contracting Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  2. State v. CannonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  3. Goldberger v. REGENCY HIGHLAND CONDOMINIUMDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  4. Amatulli v. People's BankDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1996
  5. Pingel v. Connecticut National BankDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1994

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API