Legal Opinion

State v. LATALL

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 16, 2008No. SC 89322Published

1Opinion of the Court

271 S.W.3d 561 (2008)

STATE of Missouri, Respondent,

v.

Robert LATALL, Jr., Appellant.

No. SC 89322.

Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc.

December 16, 2008.

Daniel Dodson, Jefferson City, Mo, for Appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Doug Noland, Greg A. Perry, Ashley Harms, Office of Missouri Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.

MICHAEL A. WOLFF, Judge.

Introduction

Robert Latall's appeal of his misdemeanor nonsupport conviction raises the question of whether Latall "injected the issue" of good cause, within the meaning of the statute, thus requiring the state to prove beyond…

Also in this document: Dissent; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. ChaneySupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
  2. State v. SladekSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  3. State v. GilbertSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  4. State v. LATALLSupreme Court of Missouri · 2008
  5. State v. StrubbergSupreme Court of Missouri · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API