Legal Opinion

United States v. Johnson

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided October 30, 1991No. ACMR 9100450PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

De GIULIO, Senior Judge:

Appellant was tried by special court-martial composed of officers. Contrary to her pleas, she was found guilty of two specifications of missing movement through design in violation of Article 87, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.G. § 887 (1984). She was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge, hard labor without confinement for three months, forfeiture of $503.00 pay per month for five months, and reduction to Private E1. The convening authority reduced the hard labor without confinement to 30 days but otherwise approved the sentence.

Appellant…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  2. United States v. SalesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  3. United States v. BrowersUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
  4. United States v. DanielsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1959
  5. United States v. MenokenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. PollardU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1992
  2. United States v. WoodU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API