Hoffelman v. Frank
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from St. Louis Oireuit Court. Appellant filed- an elaborate brief, but it is necessarily omitted here, because the Court does not pass upon the points discussed therein.
1Opinion of the CourtWagner, Judge
In this case the Court at General Term dismissed the appeal taken from the judgment at Special Term, and the defendant has prosecuted his appeal to this Court. Upon looking into the record, we-find that there is no bill of exceptions that we can notice. The motion for a new trial was overruled on the 13th day of October, 1871, and time during the term was granted to file the bill of exceptions, and afterwards two extensions of time were given for filing the same; the first till December 30, 1871, and the second till January 1st, 1872. But the Bill was not filed till the 26th day of January…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Holloway v. City of MoberlyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1885
- Bank of North America v. FletcherMissouri Court of Appeals · 1884
- City of St. Louis v. SaitzSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901