City of St. Louis v. Saitz
Supreme Court of Missouri
Error to St. Lonis Court of Criminal Correction. — Hon. David Murphy, Judge. The St. Louis Court of Criminal Correction is a statutory-court, and there is no statute which permits the plaintiff in a case pending in said court to file a bill of exceptions eight months after the discharge of the defendant. R. S. 1899,, p. 2544; Ex parte O’Brien, 127 Mo. 487.
1Opinion of the CourtBurgess, J.
This action was begun in the Eirst District Police Court of the city of St. Louis, against the defendant, to recover a penalty or fine for a violation of section 752,. *75of the Revised Ordinances of 1892 of that city. The offense charged was the construction of a one-story frame building on the premises of defendant in said city without having a permit so to do from the commissioner of public buildings, contrary to the ordinance in such case made and provided. The ordinance, section 752, provides that, “Every person who, as owner, agent, lessee, builder, architect or contractor, shall commence…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ex parte O'BrienSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
- State v. AppersonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
- State v. SeatonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
- State v. MosleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
- State v. BrittSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Schlereth v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1893