Maddox v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
708 So.2d 617 (1998)
David Lavern MADDOX, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 96-3590.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
March 13, 1998.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Andrea J. Surette, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
No Appearance for Appellee.
EN BANC
GRIFFIN, Chief Judge.
We have elected to hear this Anders[1] case en banc to clarify the scope of section 924.051, Florida Statutes (1996), which was enacted as part of the Criminal Appeal Reform Act. See Ch. 96-248, Laws of Florida. At issue is whether, in a direct appeal, this court may…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Concurrence.
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Robinson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
- Popple v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
- State v. DelvaSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by105 opinions
- Leonard v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
- Maddox v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
- Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
- Lynch v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
- Amendments to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.111(e) & 3.800Supreme Court of Florida · 1999
100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.