Legal Opinion

People v. Richardson

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 8, 2004No. B164991PublishedCited by 9 opinions

[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

NOTT, J.

Appellant Robert Richardson was convicted of two counts of first degree burglary. The principal issue before us is whether the simultaneous burglary of two bedrooms in a single apartment constitutes two separate offenses. Under the facts presented, we conclude that it does not.

We reverse the judgment of conviction and strike the sentence as to count two.

BACKGROUND

Appellant, who is 35 years old, has had a drug problem since his teenage years. His sister, Barbara Mayo, has attempted to help him turn his life around by giving him money and shelter on many occasions.

In June 2002,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. HaskettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. People v. NibleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  3. People v. FleetwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. People v. SparksCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  5. People v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. GarciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
  2. People v. Garcia, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  3. People v. GarciaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. People v. GarciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
  5. People v. GarciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API