Legal Opinion
Johns Hopkins University v. Nath
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
Decided September 25, 2007No. 14-06-01083-CVPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WANDA McKEE FOWLER, Justice.
Rahul K. Nath sued Johns Hopkins University (JHU) and Allen J. Belzberg, claiming defamation and tortious interference. Both JHU and Belzberg specially appeared. The trial court granted the special appearance of Belzberg, dismissing him from the suit, but denied the special appearance of JHU. JHU appeals the denial of its special appearance, and Nath appeals the granting of Belzberg’s. Because the evidence is sufficient to support the trial court’s implied finding that exercising personal jurisdiction over Nath’s claims against Belzberg would violate due…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
- Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- TV Azteca v. RuizTexas Supreme Court · 2016
- Waterman Steamship Corp. v. Ruiz, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011
- Parex Resources, Inc. and Ramshorn International Limited v. ERG Resources, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2014
- All Star Enterprise, Inc. v. Buchanan, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2009
- Motor Components, LLC v. Devon Energy Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2011
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.