ADT Security Services, Inc. v. Van Peterson Fine Jewelers

OPINION

Opinion By

Justice MOSELEY.

This is an agreed interlocutory -appeal from an order denying ADT Security Services, Inc.’s two motions for summary judgment. Initially, the trial court granted both of ADT’s motions, which disposed of all claims brought by Van Peterson Fine Jewelers against ADT. However, Van Peterson filed a motion for new trial, which the trial court granted. In the order granting Van Peterson’s motion for new trial, the trial court also denied ADT’s motions for summary judgment.

In four issues on appeal, ADT argues the trial court erred by denying its motions for summary…