Legal Opinion

United States v. Rios

District Court, E.D. Washington

Decided August 12, 2016No. 2:13-CR-02059-RHWPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S 28 U.S.C. § 2255 MOTION TO VACATE SENTENCE AND FOR RE-SENTENCING

U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE ACTION REQUIRED

ROBERT H. WHALEY, Senior United States District Judge

Before the Court is Defendant Christo-bal Miguel Rios’s 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence and for Resentencing, ECF No. 49. Having reviewed the motions and all relevant filings, the Court is fully informed.

BACKGROUND

On April 9, 2013, a grand jury returned a single-count indictment charging Mr. Rios -with possession of a firearm by a prohibited person, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). Mr. Rios pled…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  4. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  5. Mathis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. SavageDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2017
  2. McPeters v. United StatesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2016
  3. Savage v. United StatesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API