Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Dutchover

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 1, 1989No. 70836PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This is a postconviction petition for habe-as corpus relief pursuant to Article 11.07, V.A.C.C.P. Applicant was convicted of the offense of indecency with a child and assessed twenty five years to serve in the Texas Department of Corrections.

*77Applicant contends he was “unconstitutionally deprived of his right of confrontation and due process and due course of law on both federal and state grounds guaranteed by the Texas Constitution, Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution when the video tape of complainant was admitted into evidence under V.A.C.C.P.…

3Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. Milton v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Ex Parte MaldonadoCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  4. Mallory v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  5. Ex Parte CrispenCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by49 opinions

  1. Lovill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
  2. Ex parte ArgentCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013
  3. Ex Parte GardnerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  4. Ex Parte FierroCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  5. Chavez, Ex Parte AdrianCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2012

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API