Legal Opinion
McMahon v. State
New York Court of Claims
Decided August 14, 1942No. Claim No. 25718PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGreenberg, J.
This claim was filed to recover compensation for overtime services performed by the claimant while employed as a guard at the State Agricultural and Industrial School, maintained by the State at Industry, New York.
On May 25, 1936, section 168 was added to the Labor Law (Laws of 1936, chap. 716). This new section prescribed that after July 1, 1937, certain State employees, including those in the cate*866gory of the claimant, should not be required or permitted to work more than eight hours daily, or more than forty-eight hours in any calendar week, except upon the happening of one or more…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Miller v. . SchlossNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Harlem Gas Co. v. . Mayor, C., of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1865
- Lindlots Realty Corp. v. County of SuffolkNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Farrington v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- McMahon v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Parker v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1945
- Marasco v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1943
- Marriott v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1945
- St. Regis Tribe of Mohawk Indians v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1956
- Sorensen v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1951
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.