Memphis & Shelby County Bar Ass'n v. Himmelstein
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Gbeen
In this cause the defendant was suspended from the practice of law and appealed to this court. A motion is made to transfer the case to the Court of Appeals and this motion must be granted. .
Prior to the adoption of the Code of 1932, jurisdiction of appeals in such cases was clearly in the Court of Appeals, as we have- often decided. In opposition to the motion to transfer it is urged that section 9977 of the Code provides for an appeal to this court. This section was taken from chapter 42 of the Acts of 1919 without change.
On the contrary section 10618 of the Code, taken without change from…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Woodroof v. City of NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1946
- Shelton v. HickmanCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1943
- Kenneth L. Storey v. Randall E. NicholsTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
- Ackerman v. MarableCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1934
- Hatler v. StoutTennessee Supreme Court · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.