Legal Opinion

Ackerman v. Marable

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided December 22, 1934PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPOBiTRUM, J.

The transcript contains two eases brotight to this court upon separate appeals granted at separate times; the two cases will be disposed of separately here, and what is said in reference to the facts of one will have no bearings upon the facts of the other. The principal case will first be disposed of. The case was heard by the chancellor upon oral testimony and the decree recites that the hearing was pursuant to an agreement entered into by all counsel. The bill of exceptions recites, “This cause came on to be heard on this 24th day of March, 1933, before the Honorable S. E. Miller,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hinton v. Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Trice v. McGillTennessee Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Fonville v. GregoryTennessee Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Frix v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Morrell v. Republic Fire Ins. Co. of PittsburgTennessee Supreme Court · 1934

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bradford v. Martin Construction Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Johnson v. JohnsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1947
  3. State, Department of Highways v. ThorntonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API