Luttrell v. Luttrell
Indiana Supreme Court
1Dissent
DAVID, Justice.
I respectfully dissent from the denial of transfer. To provide guidance to trial courts, I believe we should address the issue of whether a lump-sum Social Security Disability Insurance payment is a marital asset subject to division upon divorce, or a factor to be considered.
In Severs v. Severs, we stated in dicta that “any assignment or division of social security benefits to satisfy a marital property settlement under Indiana law is barred by 42 U.S.C. § 407” of the Social Security Act. 837 N.E.2d 498, 501 (Ind. 2005). 42 U.S.C. § 407(a) provides that
[t]he right of any person…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Severs v. SeversIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
- Stanley v. StanleySupreme Court of Delaware · 2008