Legal Opinion · Dissent

Luttrell v. Luttrell

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 2014No. 49A02-1301-DR-85Published

1Dissent

DAVID, Justice.

I respectfully dissent from the denial of transfer. To provide guidance to trial courts, I believe we should address the issue of whether a lump-sum Social Security Disability Insurance payment is a marital asset subject to division upon divorce, or a factor to be considered.

In Severs v. Severs, we stated in dicta that “any assignment or division of social security benefits to satisfy a marital property settlement under Indiana law is barred by 42 U.S.C. § 407” of the Social Security Act. 837 N.E.2d 498, 501 (Ind. 2005). 42 U.S.C. § 407(a) provides that

[t]he right of any person…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Severs v. SeversIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Stanley v. StanleySupreme Court of Delaware · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API