Legal Opinion

Severs v. Severs

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 2005No. 82S01-0511-CV-597PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOEHM, Justice.

We hold that future disability income is a divisible marital asset in a dissolution only if the benefits are contractual rights of the beneficiary and were voluntarily purchased with marital assets. Payroll taxes do not constitute voluntary payments for this purpose. We also hold that the antiassignment provision of the Social Security Act prevents state courts from assigning social security benefits in a dissolution decree.

Facts and Procedural History

Terry and Marjorie Severs were married in 1977, and a decree of dissolution was entered in August 2008. In 2002 Terry suffered a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Flemming v. NestorSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. District of Columbia v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Hisquierdo v. HisquierdoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Philpott v. Essex County Welfare BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Mansell v. MansellSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Forrester v. ForresterSupreme Court of Delaware · 2008
  2. Benny Harris v. Tonya Harris (n/k/a Keith)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. Everette v. EveretteIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Benny Harris v. Tonya Harris (n/k/a Keith)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. In re: Traci Eileen HoultUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois · 2026

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API