Legal Opinion

Bell v. Bell

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1995No. Civ. 950141PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

Kyle Bell appeals the property distribution in his divorce from Kimberly Bell, who is now known as Kimberly Engelstad. The district court awarded all of the remaining assets of the marital estate to Engelstad. Although we are hampered by the lack of a complete transcript, the record before us, and particularly Kyle Bell’s own deposition testimony, is sufficient to convince us the district court’s property distribution is not clearly erroneous. We affirm the judgment, concluding Kyle Bell’s dissipation of most of the marital estate, primarily through his illegal flight from…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Fischer v. FischerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Ruff v. RuffNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Van Oosting v. Van OostingNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Heley v. HeleyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Rueckert v. RueckertNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Linrud v. LinrudNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Zuger v. ZugerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Wald v. WaldNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Horner v. HornerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Young v. YoungNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API