Legal Opinion

Jieyuan Tan v. Geico General Insurance Company

District Court, N.D. California

Decided September 25, 2026No. 3:26-cv-08522Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JIEYUAN TAN, Case No. 26-cv-08522-TSH 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S 13 v. MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO RULE 12(b)(6) 14 GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Re: Dkt. No. 13 15 Defendant. 16 17 I. INTRODUCTION 18 Plaintiff Jieyuan Tan, proceeding pro se, brings this insurance action against Defendant 19 Geico General Insurance Company (“Geico”) for claims arising from Geico’s conduct regarding a 20 motor vehicle collision involving Tan. ECF No. 2-1. Pending before the Court is Geico’s Motion 21 to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Michael Henry Ferdik v. Joe Bonzelet, SheriffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  5. Manzarek v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API