Legal Opinion

Wooldridge v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 22, 1911No. 978PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

PRENDERGAST, Judge.

—The appellant was indicted and convicted of seduction and the penalty fixed at two years confinement in the penitentiary.

The- Assistant Attorney-General has made a motion to dismiss this appeal, because the transcript does not show that final judgment-sentence of the appellant was ever made or entered. An examination of the record shows that no judgment of sentence has ever been entered against the appellant. Hence, there is no final judgment.

It has been the uniform holding of this court, since article 834, Code of Criminal Procedure, was adopted, that the sentence after…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Heinzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tuckness v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
  2. Haigh v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1947
  3. Bernard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1943
  4. Graham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API