Legal Opinion

Heinzman v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 19, 1895No. 586PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Tarrant. Tried below before Hon. S. P. Greene. This appeal is from a conviction for theft of property over the value of $20, the punishment assessed being two years in the penitentiary.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the District Court of Tarrant. Tried below before Hon. S. P. Greene. This appeal is from a conviction for theft of property over the value of $20, the punishment assessed being two years in the penitentiary. Defendant filed a plea in bar and motion to dismiss the prosecution, as follows: “Sow upon this day comes Lola Heinzman, defendant in the above styled cause, and says that the State of Texas should not further prosecute her herein, and that the State of Texas ought through her county attorney to move this court to dismiss said cause from the docket of said court, and said…

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Judge.

This conviction having been obtained for theft of property, an appeal was sought to be prosecuted. Notice of appeal was entered, but sentence, which is the final judgment in this character of felony, was not pronounced; hence, the jurisdiction of this court does not attach to such appeal.

The appeal is dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Judges all present and concurring.

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Scribner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Ex Parte JosephCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1962
  3. Wooldridge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
  4. Ex Parte GreenhawCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1899
  5. Ex Parte JosephCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API