James v. City of Boise
Supreme Court of the United States
1Per curiam
Under federal law, a court has discretion to "allow the prevailing party, other than the United States, a reasonable attorney's fee" in a civil rights lawsuit filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 . 42 U.S.C. § 1988 . In Hughes v. Rowe, 449 U.S. 5 , 101 S.Ct. 173 , 66 L.Ed.2d 163 (1980) ( per curiam ), this Court interpreted § 1988 to permit a prevailing defendant in such a suit to recover fees only if "the plaintiff's action was frivolous, unreasonable, or without foundation." Id., at 14 , 101 S.Ct. 173 (quoting Christiansburg Garment Co. v. EEOC, 434 U.S. 412 , 421, 98 S.Ct. 694 , 54 L.Ed.2d 648…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Martin v. Hunter's LesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1816
- Rivers v. Roadway Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Nitro-Lift Technologies, L. L. C. v. HowardSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Lockhart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Williams v. Bayer Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2017
- Stephen Michael West v. Derrick D. SchofieldTennessee Supreme Court · 2017
- Gordon Schuster v. Prestige Senior Management LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- Kara Alexander v. Vianna StibalIdaho Supreme Court · 2016
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.