Legal Opinion

Home Insurance v. New York Central Railroad

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1963No. Calendar No. 24, Docket No. 49,707PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

(for reversal). Plaintiffs, as subrogees of Lee Paper Company, instituted suit in the Kalamazoo county circuit court to recover damages for *63defendant’s negligence resulting in contamination of photographic paper pulp during shipment over defendant’s railroad.

The pretrial statement contained the following: •“The subrogation is agreed to, and if plaintiffs are 'entitled to judgment their damages are agreed to he $4,275.55.”

A jury verdict was returned for the stipulated .amount, and defendant appeals claiming (1) that the (evidence presented at the trial was not sufficient to .justify submission…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Thompson Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Frohlich v. Pennsylvania Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Gramling Electric Refrigeration, Inc. v. Southern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
  4. Ginsberg v. Wabash Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Marks Manufacturing Company v. New York Central Railroad Co., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API