Legal Opinion

DUBLIN BY DUBLIN v. Shuster

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 30, 1991No. 2976, 2977PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Judge:

In this opinion we are called upon to determine whether the trial court was correct iri finding that a general release signed by Charlotte and Bernard Dublin [hereinafter “Dublins”] on behalf of themselves and their minor son, appellee, Bernard Dublin, Jr. [hereinafter “Bernard”] pursuant to a court-approved settlement did not preclude Bernard’s claim against appellants, Germantown Hospital and Medical Center [hereinafter “Hospital”] and Harold Shuster, M.D. and John Duda, M.D. [hereinafter “Doctors”]. For the reasons which follow, we find the release precludes Bernard’s claim,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Buttermore v. Aliquippa HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Restifo v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  3. Salerno v. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Hasselrode v. GnageySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  5. Kerns v. Methodist HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Goldey v. Trustees of the University of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Pennsylvania State University v. University Orthopedics, Ltd.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Vaughn v. DidizianSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Harrity v. Medical College of Pennsylvania HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Holmes v. Lankenau HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API