Legal Opinion

Barney v. Burrow

District Court, E.D. California

Decided May 16, 2008No. CV F 08-0373 LJO GSAPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (Doc. 29.)

LAWRENCE J. O’NEILL, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Smith Barney seeks to prohibit permanently defendants Jason Gordo (“Mr.Gordo”), Jeff Burrow (“Mr.Burrow”), and Valley Wealth, Incorporated (“Valley Wealth”) 1 to solicit Smith Barney clients and to use or destroy information which financial advisors Mr. Burrow and Mr. Gordo acquired during their Smith Barney employment and which Smith Barney characterizes as its trade secrets. Smith Barney also seeks return from Mr. Burrow and Mr. Gordo of all documents and records containing Smith…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. MAI Systems Corp. v. Peak Computer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  2. Stanley v. University of Southern CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  3. Lisa Martin v. International Olympic CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  4. Muggill v. Reuben H. Donnelley Corp.California Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Morlife, Inc. v. PerryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wachovia Securities, L.L.C. v. StantonDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2008
  2. Bessemer Trust Co., N.A. v. BraninNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC v. SaylerDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API