United States v. Slazenger
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
Appeal by the United States from a decision of the board of United States general appraisers which sustained the protest of the importers as to the merchandise in question.
1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, District Judge
(orally). The articles in question are tennis balls, made of India-rubber and covered with wool; the India rubber being the component material of chief value. They were assessed for duty under the provisions of paragraphs 366 and 391 of the act of 1897 (30 Stat. 184, 187), as manufactures of which wool is a component material, at 44 cents per pound, and 55 per cent, ad valorem. The question herein has been disposed of in the appeal of these importers (Slazenger v. U. S. [C. C.] 91 Fed. 517), except in so far as it may be affected by the following proviso in paragraph 391 (30 Stat. 187) of the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Slazenger v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1899
3Cited by3 opinions
- Loewenthal v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
- United States v. Scruggs, Vandervoort & Barney Dry Goods Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
- United States v. E. De F. Wilkinson Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Rhode Island · 1907