Smoot v. Harbur
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the CourtHyde, J.
[250] This is an action to construe a will. The construction of the trial court was affirmed by the St. Louis Court of Appeals. [Smoot v. Harbur, 203 S. W, (2d) 890.] We transferred it here upon appellant’s claim that the opinion of the Court of Appeals was in conflict with our opinion in Meiners v. Meiners, 179 Mo. 614, 78 S. W. 795. We refer to the opinion of the Court of Appeals for the pleadings.
The question for decision is whether the will gives appellant a one-fourth or one-eighth share- as residuary legatee. If she has only ' a one-eightb then testatrix died -intestate as to one-eighth…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Meiners v. MeinersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1904
- Stone v. City of JeffersonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1927
- Hayes v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1947
- Wiechert v. WiechertSupreme Court of Missouri · 1927
3Cited by12 opinions
- Housman v. LewellenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
- Winkel v. StreicherSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
- Gehring v. HenrySupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
- Shaw v. WertzSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
- Ramsey v. City of BrookfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.