Legal Opinion
McCarthy v. Peterson
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided September 30, 2003No. ED 82344PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., Presiding Judge.
Appellants, Edward and Margaret McCarthy (“owners”), appeal the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County in favor of respondent, Robert H. Peterson (“Collector”). Owners argue their ad valorem tax bill was a void agency order because the Collector did not conduct a physical inspection before increasing the valuation of their property more than 17%. 1 We affirm.
Owners own property at 7101 Princeton Avenue in St. Louis County. On March 29, 2002, owners filed an action in small claims court to recover the $1,140.88 paid in protest on the ad valorem…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Two Pershing Square, L.P. v. BoleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- St. Louis University v. Hesselberg Drug Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- Mogley v. FlemingMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
- Quaker Oats Co. v. StantonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
- Pentecostal Church of God v. HughlettSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Vogt v. EmmonsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
- Brunner v. City of ArnoldMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- Willits v. Peabody Coal Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- Carl and Janice Duffner v. City of St. PetersMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
- City of St. Louis v. CernicekMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004